How it works
The CSI interview typically involves at least three stages:
1 – Scientific Presentation by the PhD Student (supervisors are invited but must not interfere in the discussion at this stage)
-
- The PhD student givesan oral presentation.
- A discussion follows between the CSI and the PhD student.
- The supervisors are invited but must keep quiet during this stage.
2 – Discussion between the PhD Student and the CSI (this takes place without the presence of supervisors nor any laboratory representatives).
3 – Discussion between the Supervisors and the CSI (this takes place without the PhD student )
A final session involving all participants (PhD student, supervisors, CSI) may also be organised at the CSI’s discretion.
♦ The DS provides interview report form that outline all the topics to be addressed. For example, the CSI must ask the doctoral student whether they are given the opportunity to teach or participate in conferences. The CSI should also remind supervisors of the importance of publishing before the defence and advise the PhD student to attend training courses. It is essential that the PhD student presents an updated version of their Training and Production Report Form as well as Portfolio at each meeting. The CSI should also encourage the doctoral student to consider their career plans and assist in preparing for the post-thesis period.
♦ One of the CSI’s crucial roles is to detect and resolve any conflicts between the PhD student and their thesis supervisor as early as possible. The CSI serves as the first point of recourse, which may be supplemented by other mechanisms outlined in the DS’s internal regulations. The Executive Board is fully available to support the CSI in any mediation efforts required.
By following the links below, you can access a letter summarising the CSI’s role, the mandatory interviews, and guidance on how to prepare for them.
(The format for the scientific report to be sent to CSI members approximately one week before the meeting is flexible; no template is provided.)